Good news for a change

posted by Jeff | Friday, January 16, 2009, 12:00 PM | comments: 4

I'm fascinated by the story of the plane that went down in the Hudson River. It just seems too fantastic to be real. But that said, the thing that makes it so great is that the ending was overwhelmingly positive.

ABC News had an interesting factoid that surprised me. They said that the notion that most people in plane crashes die is a total myth, that in fact 95% of people in commercial airline crashes survive. It's probably that only the most spectacular and deadly crashes grab big headlines. Those and water landings.


Comments

CPLady

January 16, 2009, 5:10 PM #

I caught this on cnn.com yesterday afternoon 15 minutes after it happened and I, too, was overwhelmingly happy to see everyone get out alive. In fact, the only real injury I've read about is one person with two broken legs.

I read this morning the pilot was a fighter pilot in the 70's and is currently a safety consultant as well as a commercial airline pilot.

He did all the right things.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/TRAVEL/01/15/usairways.landing/index.html

Carrie

January 16, 2009, 5:27 PM #

Yeah, I agree this was a great story.

But as I understand it, the 95% survival rate is for all plane incidents. The survival rate for actual crashes is about 76%. Still higher than you would think, but not as high as 95%.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1872154,00.html?imw=Y

Gonch

January 16, 2009, 9:13 PM #

I'm assuming that 76% is the survival rate of ALL crashes, correct?

What's the percentage when you only consider the large commercial airliners and ignore private planes or smaller commuter planes?

Carrie

January 16, 2009, 9:44 PM #

Yeah, that's the tough part. I didn't read any context to the stats. I don't know who all was included and I don't know how they defined crashes/incidents. I wonder if something is published on the FAA site.


Post your comment: